Reading this article now - http://qz.com/67991/you-didnt-make-the-harlem-shake-go-viral-corporations-did/
So can someone explain to me, if the copyright
holder gets 50% of the $6cpm and the video uploader also gets $3cpm…..then is
YouTube actually making any money from a cost for content of $6cpm +server hardware+internet
bandwidth +engineering salaries OR are these payment actually CPA and not CPM?
Are companies really paying >$6CPM for those
tiny banner ads on YouTube and when was the last time you clicked on one OR didn’t
fast forward through an interstitial?
Thoughts?
No comments :
Post a Comment